Blog & Videos  
Quotes  
Books
About
Search
Register
Login

To Get Gain

Footnotes

Modern Mormonism teaches that salvation comes in and through the temple ordinances (see “Temples”). Because of this, all aspects of the church point to the temple. Financial aspects of the church are no different. Because temples are taught as necessary to salvation, and because temples cost so much to build, it is understandable that the church puts so much emphasis on the acquisition of money.

Of course, the temple model for salvation does not require the army of professionals employed by the church, nor the smaller contingent of paid ministers employed by the church (CES, General Authorities, and mission presidents). Oddly, the annual combined cost of all church employees easily exceeds the cost to build and maintain temples. To labor for money in the name of building Zion is explicitly identified by Nephi as priestcraft: “the laborer in Zion shall labor for Zion; for if they labor for money they shall perish” (2 Ne. 26:31).

Nephi prophesied that “the Gentiles” would do exactly these things. Though modern Mormons comfortably shrug off this prophecy to the Catholics, it is unquestionable that the church’s actions fit the bill.

And the Gentiles are lifted up in the pride of their eyes, and have stumbled, because of the greatness of their stumbling block, that they have built up many churches; nevertheless, they put down the power and miracles of God, and preach up unto themselves their own wisdom and their own learning, that they may get gain and grind upon the face of the poor. (2 Nephi 26:20.)

Has the church built many churches? The church breaks ground on one chapel per day. Have the leaders put down the power and miracles of God?

They have preached consistently that revelation is just your feelings,1 that only the unrighteous seek spiritual manifestations,2 that spiritual gifts are often from the devil,3 and that, contrary to God’s word on the subject, one should not actually seek the face of Jesus in this life.4

Have the leaders “preached up unto themselves their own wisdom and their own learning?” They have truly set themselves up as the light of the world, proclaiming that revelation can’t be from God if it disagrees with them,5 that we should trust in them for salvation,6 that their opinions should be accepted as God’s word,7 and that a man’s allegiance to Christ is measured by his allegiance to them.8

But have these teachings been demonstrably for the purpose of getting gain at the expense of the poor? If a poor man can obtain salvation directly from Christ, he does not need to worry about selling his house or working away from his family for years in order to obtain salvific ordinances from the church while the rich can obtain it without any such sacrifice.9 If a poor man can obtain salvation directly from Christ, he doesn’t have to go without food, medicine, or shelter to pay 10% of his already insufficient income to the church in order to finance ornate temples10 and luxury living standards for church employees. Turning the people away from Christ and towards themselves in order to maintain their dependence upon them is a literal fulfillment of 2Nephi 26:20, and it is particularly harmful to the poor, whose sacrifices to maintain membership in the system must far exceed that of the rich.

Therefore, there is no doubt that the following lament lays squarely upon the leaders of modern Mormonism as much as any other group:

O ye wicked and perverse and stiffnecked people, why have ye built up churches unto yourselves to get gain? Why have ye transfigured the holy word of God, that ye might bring damnation upon your souls? Behold, look ye unto the revelations of God; for behold, the time cometh at that day when all these things must be fulfilled. (Mormon 8:33.)

The change of tithing from a one-time consecration with 10% of annual surplus thereafter to 10% of annual income with no consecration of surplus was a change made by fiat with the intent to bring in more money.11 Because God gave no revelation to change his standing law forever (D&C 119), this was and is a transfiguration of the holy word of God.

Changes to align church policy more closely to God’s revealed word would not need to be drastic (though many church employees would lose high paying jobs). For example, the church is already buying massive tracts of farmland. Would it be that much of a change to buy it in the developing world instead of the United States, and give poor members the opportunity to farm their own food? Simply by moving these land holdings to the developing world, the church could save millions of church members from poverty.

Other, more drastic changes, would be needed to bring about complete compliance with God’s word. He doesn’t provide a mechanism for priestcraft or for a for-profit church. He doesn’t provide for a way to have both rich and poor members.

And it is my purpose to provide for my saints, for all things are mine. But it must needs be done in mine own way; and behold this is the way that I, the Lord, have decreed to provide for my saints, that the poor shall be exalted, in that the rich are made low. For the earth is full, and there is enough and to spare; yea, I prepared all things, and have given unto the children of men to be agents unto themselves. Therefore, if any man shall take of the abundance which I have made, and impart not his portion, according to the law of my gospel, unto the poor and the needy, he shall, with the wicked, lift up his eyes in hell, being in torment. (D&C 104:15-18.)

He did not say, “my way is that the rich remain rich and the poor remain poor.” The way he has appointed is that the money flow from the rich to the poor. If this is true of individuals, should it not be true of the church itself? Does God approve of a rich church whose members are still poor?

In the end, it is abundantly clear that the model of the church is that salvation comes in and through temples and the paid personnel of the church, and therefore the objective of the church is to gain as much money as possible in order to finance the temple-church employee complex because, under this model, the more money gained, the more souls can be saved. As a result, the poor are disproportionately deprived of welfare that would otherwise be their due under the gospel, and also disproportionately deprived of the little they have as a result of priestcraft. While the church decides against proselyting activities that will only add poor members to the church, such as baptizing thousands of Africans who have petitioned for missionaries,12 the church infrastructure is filled with entities whose sole purpose is to get gain.

First among its for-profit enterprises is DMC, which reaps estimated annual revenue of $1.2 billion from six subsidiaries, according to the business information and analysis firm Hoover’s Company Records (DNB). Those subsidiaries run a newspaper, 11 radio stations, a TV station, a publishing and distribution company, a digital media company, a hospitality business, and an insurance business with assets worth $3.3 billion. AgReserves, another forprofit Mormon umbrella company, together with other church-run agricultural affiliates, reportedly owns about 1 million acres in the continental U.S., on which the church has farms, hunting preserves, orchards, and ranches. These include the $1 billion, 290,000-acre Deseret Ranches in Florida, which, in addition to keeping 44,000 cows and 1,300 bulls, also has citrus, sod, and timber operations. Outside the U.S., AgReserves operates in Britain, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil. Its Australian property, valued at $61 million in 1997, has estimated annual sales of $276 million, according to Dun & Bradstreet. The church also runs several for-profit real estate arms that own, develop, and manage malls, parking lots, office parks, residential buildings, and more. Hawaii Reserves, for example, owns or manages more than 7,000 acres on Oahu, where it maintains commercial and residential buildings, parks, water and sewage infrastructure, and two cemeteries. Utah Property Management Associates, a real estate arm of the church, manages portions of City Creek Center. According to Spencer P. Eccles from the Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Development, the mall cost the church an estimated $2 billion. It is only one part of a $5 billion church-funded revamping of downtown Salt Lake City, according to the Mormon-owned news site KSL. (http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2012-0710/how-the-mormons-make-money.)

The article goes on to list Ensign Peak Advisors, a multi-billion dollar hedge fund whose sole purpose is to invest money for the church. Since this article was published, the church has accelerated the acquisition of real estate holdings, including the construction of a luxury apartment complex on the site of the new Philadelphia temple.

In the end, the following criticism from Moroni seems to fit well:

For behold, ye do love money, and your substance, and your fine apparel, and the adorning of your churches, more than ye love the poor and the needy, the sick and the afflicted....Yea, why do ye build up your secret abominations to get gain, and cause that widows should mourn before the Lord, and also orphans to mourn before the Lord, and also the blood of their fathers and their husbands to cry unto the Lord from the ground, for vengeance upon your heads? Behold, the sword of vengeance hangeth over you; and the time soon cometh that he avengeth the blood of the saints upon you, for he will not suffer their cries any longer. (Mormon 8:36-41.)

Footnotes

  • 1. Under a bold heading reading “If we are humble and sensitive, the Lord will prompt us through our feelings,” the 2015 Priesthood and Relief Society manual quotes President Ezra Taft Benson saying “When you do good, you feel good, and that is the Holy Ghost speaking to you....We hear the words of the Lord most often by a feeling. If we are humble and sensitive, the Lord will prompt us through our feelings.” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Ezra Taft Benson, (2014), 156–66) ↩
  • 2. Moroni clearly taught that the absence of spiritual manifestations indicated a lack of faith and was a condition that called for repentance. “And now I speak unto all the ends of the earth—that if the day cometh that the power and gifts of God shall be done away among you, it shall be because of unbelief. And wo be unto the children of men if this be the case; for there shall be none that doeth good among you, no not one. For if there be one among you that doeth good, he shall work by the power and gifts of God. (Moroni 10:24-25) Behold I say unto you, Nay; for it is by faith that miracles are wrought; and it is by faith that angels appear and minister unto men; wherefore, if these things have ceased wo be unto the children of men, for it is because of unbelief, and all is vain. (Moroni 7:37) Yet, Elder Bednar recently taught that it was normal to “not receive frequent, miraculous, or strong impressions.” He said “as we consider the experiences of Joseph in the Sacred Grove, of Saul on the road to Damascus, and of Alma the Younger, we come to believe something is wrong with or lacking in us if we fall short in our lives of these well-known and spiritually striking examples. If you have had similar thoughts or doubts, please know that you are quite normal.” (April 2011 General Conference) Elder Bednar quoted Joseph F. Smith who taught much earlier “Show me Latter-day Saints who have to feed upon miracles, signs and visions in order to keep them steadfast in the Church, and I will show you members...who are not in good standing before God, and who are walking in slippery paths. It is not by marvelous manifestations unto us that we shall be established in the truth, but it is by humility and faithful obedience to the commandments and laws of God” (in Conference Report, Apr. 1900, 40). ↩
  • 3. “I believe that if one wants revelations enough to crave them beyond the rightness of it, that eventually he will get his revelations but they may not come from God. I am sure that there may be many spectacular things performed because the devil is very responsive.” President Spencer W. Kimball, quoted by Richard Turley, Church Historian, in June 2015 Boise Meeting with Elder Oaks. ↩
  • 4. “Of course, all of the righteous desire to see the face of our Savior, but the suggestions that this must happen in mortality is a familiar tactic of the adversary. To identify a worthy goal, such as to achieve exaltation, and then to use the desirability of that goal and people’s enthusiasm for it to obscure the new means the adversary suggests to achieve it.” (Elder Dallin H. Oaks, June 2015 Boise Meeting.) ↩
  • 5. “When visions, dreams, tongues, prophecy, impressions or an extraordinary gift or inspiration convey something out of harmony with the accepted revelations of the Church or contrary to the decisions of its constituted authorities, Latter-day Saints may know that it is not of God, no matter how plausible it may appear. Also, they should understand that directions for the guidance of the Church will come, by revelation, through the head. All faithful members are entitled to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit for themselves, their families, and for those over whom they are appointed and ordained to preside. But anything at discord with that which comes from God through the head of the Church is not to be received as authoritative or reliable.” (First Presidency Letter, August 1913, repeated often since and as recently as June 2015 by Richard Turley, Church Historian with Elder Oaks in a Boise regional meeting) ↩
  • 6. “The calling of 15 men to the holy apostleship provides great protection for us as members of the Church. Why? Because decisions of these leaders must be unanimous.13 Can you imagine how the Spirit needs to move upon 15 men to bring about unanimity?... Trust me! These 15 men—prophets, seers, and revelators—know what the will of the Lord is when unanimity is reached!” (Elder Russell M. Nelson, “Sustaining the Prophets,” April 2014 General Conference.) ↩
  • 7. See “Prophet: Title or Description?” ↩
  • 8. “...the key question on who’s on the Lord’s side is how they feel about the church’s current prophetic leadership. If those feelings are sufficiently negative, they take members into what we call apostasy.” (Dallin Oaks, Boise, Idaho, June 17, 2105.) ↩
  • 9. “May I share with you the account of Tihi and Tararaina Mou Tham and their 10 children. The entire family except for one daughter joined the Church in the early 1960s....Soon they began to desire the blessings of an eternal family sealing in the temple. At that time the nearest temple to the Mou Tham family was the Hamilton New Zealand Temple, more than 2,500 miles (4,000 km) to the southwest, accessible only by expensive airplane travel. The large Mou Tham family, which eked out a meager living on a small plantation, had no money for airplane fare, nor was there any opportunity for employment on their Pacific island. So Brother Mou Tham and his son Gérard made the difficult decision to travel 3,000 miles (4,800 km) to work in New Caledonia, where another son was already employed. The three Mou Tham men labored for four years. Brother Mou Tham alone returned home only once during that time, for the marriage of a daughter. After four years, Brother Mou Tham and his sons had saved enough money to take the family to the New Zealand Temple. All who were members went except for one daughter, who was expecting a baby. They were sealed for time and eternity, an indescribable and joyful experience. Brother Mou Tham returned from the temple directly to New Caledonia, where he worked for two more years to pay for the passage of the one daughter who had not been at the temple with them—a married daughter and her child and husband.” (President Thomas S. Monson, “The Holy Temple—a Beacon to the World,” April 2011 General Conference.) ↩
  • 10. The church maintains that the gilded nature of temple construction is necessary for God to accept them. The scriptures and history prove otherwise, as discussed in “Temples.” ↩
  • 11. President Lorenzo Snow made this calculated change to reverse the difficulty of paying the innovative repetitive 10% consecrations exacted by his predecessors. Many, knowing that they could not comply with this excessive request, had simply stopped paying anything. Restoring tithing to 10% of annual surplus made paying tithing possible again. Dropping the revealed initial consecration made it a lot easier still. ↩
  • 12. This is referred to as the “centers of strength” policy. See http://www.cumorah.com/index.php?target=view_other_articles&story_id=569&ca t_id=30 ↩